what would you do

Non Focus discussion. Pretty much other cars and off topic stuff.
Y2k
At Least It's Boosted..
Posts: 1339
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:43 pm
Location: Indonesia

what would you do if you're going to spend about $11000 on focus.
go for 2002 SVT @48k with 7 year extended warranty or
2005 ST @17k

or just get a new one...?
:lol:
Last edited by Y2k on Thu May 18, 2006 6:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
TQ is addictive
Louis Zerr
and so it lives.
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:24 am
Location: Mayer, MN

Wait for a Mazdaspeed 3!
Slower than your stock focus.
o2designs
Making skinny jeans look baggy since 2009
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:27 pm
Car: Bone Stock Focuseses
Location: Rochester

I'm assuming the ST has the 2.3 with a 5spd? If so, I would go for the ST. Also, it depends on what color.

Although, I would probably buy a low milage white wagon with a 2.3. With our without a 5spd. If it did'nt come with a manual, I would take the extra money, and drop in a 5spd with a FS Turbo and a limited slip diff.....MMMMMMMMMMMMM
Pants too tight, wheels so bright!
Louis Zerr
and so it lives.
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:24 am
Location: Mayer, MN

Mazdaspeed 3= turbo 2.3 250 bhp, euro focus under the skin
Slower than your stock focus.
Y2k
At Least It's Boosted..
Posts: 1339
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:43 pm
Location: Indonesia

yea its 05 st silver manual 2.3 duratec.

do you know how much the estimated MSRP mazdaspeed 3 will be?
Image
TQ is addictive
Louis Zerr
and so it lives.
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:24 am
Location: Mayer, MN

that i do not know, but i may have the old lady convinced soon enough. It will definitly be over 20K though.
Slower than your stock focus.
spots25
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:24 pm
Contact:

i'd go with the 2.3 duratec. Then, put on SVT brakes and suspension :D
00' Kona
User avatar
sc0tty8
Posts: 1816
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:21 am
Location: Litchfield MN

Since the mazda wasn't an option I would hit the SVT focus, ditch the warranty and put a powerworks on it...
o2designs
Making skinny jeans look baggy since 2009
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:27 pm
Car: Bone Stock Focuseses
Location: Rochester

spots25 wrote: i'd go with the 2.3 duratec. Then, put on SVT brakes and suspension :D


The ST should already have the upgraded brakes. Front and rear disc.
Pants too tight, wheels so bright!
User avatar
Eleanor Focus
Posts: 1017
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 7:40 am
Location: Rockford, Minnesota
Contact:

I would go with the 2005 ST the duratec is definitly worth the money and I hear that the svt takes premium gas. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I would rather pay for a fillup of regular over premium any day!

Edmunds.com says

2002 SVT

Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 2 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 170 hp
Max Horsepower: 7000 rpm Torque: 145 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 5500 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Manual: 21 mpg / 25 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Manual: 277.2 mi. / 330 mi.


2005 ST

Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 2.3 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 151 hp
Max Horsepower: 5750 rpm Torque: 154 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4250 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Manual: 20 mpg / 31 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Manual: 280 mi. / 434 mi.
mars
Posts: 1308
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:42 pm
Location: STP

i guess, ST 2.3...... that's if ur still into the focus, unless u get an mazda (ford2.3turbo) all set up already......
2004 EAP Comp. Orange Focus SVT - LOUD AZZ SVT exhaust!!!!
Image
146.64whp/129.47tq
focinite
Master of Phonemic orthography
Posts: 3718
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:32 pm
Car: black cvp vroom vroom
Location: anoka mn

i dont care what any one says, the st is a poor excuse for a replacement. the svt is still quicker than the st and rides better than the st. im not fond of the four door, and the mazda is fing ugly. do the right thing and import a new st from the uk they have one fairly cheep.http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/2006-FORD-FOCUS-S ... dZViewItem
Image wink wink.....bitches
Flea
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:05 am
Car: 2002 explorer limited
Location: belle plaine
Contact:

focinite...you realize that 17,000 pounds is like 30,000 us dollars right?
07 stang 4.0, T5, Pony Package.
Image
spots25
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:24 pm
Contact:

Flea wrote: focinite...you realize that 17,000 pounds is like 30,000 us dollars right?


flea... you realize that car is worth every penny right? 8)
00' Kona
focinite
Master of Phonemic orthography
Posts: 3718
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:32 pm
Car: black cvp vroom vroom
Location: anoka mn

Flea wrote: focinite...you realize that 17,000 pounds is like 30,000 us dollars right?
yeah ... no im not good at math..ha ha. the version of the st we have is not a real st. look at the st170(a svt) look at the st2(a turbo mazda 3) the new st is a turbo 5 cyl that is closer to the volvo t3 than any thing. but we get a 150 horse five speed turd and are sposed to be happy wit it, i think not. if it were up to me i would go with the svt its a much tighter package, as where the st is about as tight as a bucket of water. :lol:
Image wink wink.....bitches
Post Reply