Well put it on the mustang dyno here at school today and I gotta say I was a little disappointed. I had heard I should be around 140+ stock at the wheels. I have a K+N filter, new plugs and MSD wires. Well I made 124 whp at like 6300 rpm and 112 wtq at around 5000 rpm. I will post up the print out once I get it scanned in.
Are these numbers unusual? What could be wrong?
Dyno'd my SVTF this morning
-
- Borlatap
- Posts: 3559
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:08 am
- Car: 06 Wagon, 02 SVTF, 00 ZX3
- Location: Aitkin, MN
A tune will wake it up
Mybe Steve will chip in here he has a great tune on his SVT.

Mybe Steve will chip in here he has a great tune on his SVT.
00 ZX3 "RattleTrap"
06 Wagon Doggy mover
95 Chevy Silverado Tow rig for lawn mowers
02 SVTF ...........
06 Wagon Doggy mover
95 Chevy Silverado Tow rig for lawn mowers
02 SVTF ...........
-
- have you seen my boxers?
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:11 pm
- Car: 09 Mustang GT, 14 Focus
- Location: WI
140+ WHP is normal - On a dynojet...
Your numbers are right for a Mustang or Dyno Dynamics dyno's. They read about 15%-20% lower than dynojets.
So your car is right where it should be. For example I'm 199whp on a dyno dynamics and am super tempted to get some wicked street cred numbers by dynoing on a dynojet haha, as I'd likely be in the 225 + range...
Your numbers are right for a Mustang or Dyno Dynamics dyno's. They read about 15%-20% lower than dynojets.
So your car is right where it should be. For example I'm 199whp on a dyno dynamics and am super tempted to get some wicked street cred numbers by dynoing on a dynojet haha, as I'd likely be in the 225 + range...
Prestige WorldWide The First Word In Entertainment
______________Boats and Ho's!_____________
______________Boats and Ho's!_____________
- Steve@Tasca
- Midget
- Posts: 8928
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 1:26 pm
Yep, it's the dyno.
Mine put down 154 hp and 140 lb.ft. on a Dynojet.
The other SVT I dynoed with put down 138 whp and 128 lb.ft. but his was 100% stock at the time and mines tuned.
If you figure an approximate 20% loss through the drivetrain a 170 flywheel hp car should put down about 136 wheel horsepower.
And I can tell you right now that a cat back and throttle body won't show much if any gain on the dyno, a couple HP max but the throttle response and sound will be well worth it.
You need a tune.
Mine put down 154 hp and 140 lb.ft. on a Dynojet.
The other SVT I dynoed with put down 138 whp and 128 lb.ft. but his was 100% stock at the time and mines tuned.
If you figure an approximate 20% loss through the drivetrain a 170 flywheel hp car should put down about 136 wheel horsepower.
And I can tell you right now that a cat back and throttle body won't show much if any gain on the dyno, a couple HP max but the throttle response and sound will be well worth it.
You need a tune.

Tasca Auto Group- Employee pricing on all parts.

http://www.tascaparts.com/partlocator/i ... eid=213668
1-800-598-1484 or spowell@tasca.com

http://www.tascaparts.com/partlocator/i ... eid=213668
1-800-598-1484 or spowell@tasca.com
-
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:59 pm
- Car: 2012 Infiniti G37x
- Location: Hugo, MN.
- Contact:
- Steve@Tasca
- Midget
- Posts: 8928
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 1:26 pm
If you look at the numbers it's got to be the Dynojet.ch435 wrote:So which dyno do people consider the most accurate then?
Like I said, if a car is rated at 170 flywheel hp it should put down about 136 hp at the wheels given the approximate 20% drivetrain loss.
SVT's seem to be a bit under rated by the factory for the most part, I know Ford/SVT got real cautious about horsepower claims after the issues with the 2001 Cobras being proven to be under the claimed power levels.
Tasca Auto Group- Employee pricing on all parts.

http://www.tascaparts.com/partlocator/i ... eid=213668
1-800-598-1484 or spowell@tasca.com

http://www.tascaparts.com/partlocator/i ... eid=213668
1-800-598-1484 or spowell@tasca.com