Page 1 of 1

Just finished on dyno

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:56 pm
by OrbitusXpandeR
so I got the car in to the dyno today. Because I started running lean past around 6k we opted not to tune the ecu yet, as he was convinced that I need new injectors because they were pegging out (I honestly don't know), so we just messed with the cams today, but I can't say that I'm disappointed with what we got:


Image

Image

again, this is full exhaust, FRIM, FC cold air, Pro-M MAF, Mild ported cylinder head, Crower Stg II's and CFM UDPs


Greg

Re: Just finished on dyno

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:54 pm
by Steve@Tasca
I'm not sure I'm reading that right, is it showing 160whp and around 138 lb ft?

That's really not bad for being untuned, quite good really.

My SVT did 154 whp and 140 lb ft with a decent tune and an SVT head actually outflows an FRPP ported head and I have higher compression.

Wait till you're tuned to be disappointed. I don't think you will be.

Re: Just finished on dyno

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:42 pm
by OrbitusXpandeR
it's 159.3hp and 135tq. and I said "I CAN'T say that I'm disappointed." I probably could have worded that better ;) I'm RATHER pleased with the results, it's honestly quite a bit more that I was expecting. And it hasn't actually been tuned on a dyno, but I do have a generic SCT tune in there. Not sure what I'm going to do about that, though. I need bigger injectors and get a billet oil pump to fix the lean issue and let it wind out a little farther, and then i need to decide whether to go back to DB (i was pretty pleased with them) or get a remote tune. Any input?


Greg

Re: Just finished on dyno

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:01 am
by Steve@Tasca
Unless you're revving it past 7500 or so you don't have to worry about the oil pump.

I'd just stick with DB, a remote tune is okay on a relatively stock car but you can't beat a good dyno tune and your car isn't stock.